Search for Indicators
2020-2024 Regional Health Improvement Plan (RHIP) Measures
The following measures or indicators are tracked for the 2020-2024 Regional Health Improvement Plan (RHIP).
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target; 
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time; 
significant change over time; 
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage
Value
Compared to:
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Crook
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Crook
87.3%
Percent (%)
(2020-2021 School Year)
Compared to:
OR Value
(79.0% in 2018-2019 School Year)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(77.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(76.6%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Deschutes
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Deschutes
78.3%
Percent (%)
(2020-2021 School Year)
Compared to:
OR Value
(79.0% in 2018-2019 School Year)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(81.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(77.3%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Jefferson
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Jefferson
87.2%
Percent (%)
(2020-2021 School Year)
Compared to:
OR Value
(79.0% in 2018-2019 School Year)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(87.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(83.4%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Food Insecurity Rate County: Crook
Food Insecurity Rate County: Crook
12.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OR Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(10.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(13.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Food Insecurity Rate County: Deschutes
Food Insecurity Rate County: Deschutes
11.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OR Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(8.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(11.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Food Insecurity Rate County: Jefferson
Food Insecurity Rate County: Jefferson
14.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
OR Value
(13.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
US Value
(13.5%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Prior Value
(12.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)
Value
Compared to:
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Crook
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Crook
38.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(45.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(27.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Deschutes
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Deschutes
25.3%
(2021)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(32.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(24.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(24.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Jefferson
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Jefferson
31.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(28.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: La Pine
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: La Pine
55.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Oregon counties.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 307 locales.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(25.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
OR Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(52.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(24.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Madras
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Madras
36.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Oregon counties.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 307 locales.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
OR Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(33.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Prineville
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Prineville
48.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Oregon counties.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 307 locales.
Crook, OR County Value
(38.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Crook County value.
OR Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(56.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(27.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Redmond
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Redmond
33.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Oregon counties.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 307 locales.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(25.3% in 2021)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
OR Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(32.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(24.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Warm Springs
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Warm Springs
21.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 22 Oregon counties.
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 307 locales.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(31.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
OR Value
(33.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(16.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32.0%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income
Value
Compared to:
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Crook
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Crook
67.0%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(64%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Deschutes
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Deschutes
58.0%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(58.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(55%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Jefferson
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Jefferson
58.0%
Percent (%)
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(53.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(55%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination
Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas
Value
Compared to:
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: La Pine
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: La Pine
0.13
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.24)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
La Pine RHIP Target
(0.62)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Madras
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Madras
0.61
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.68)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Madras RHIP Target
(0.62)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Prineville
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Prineville
0.46
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.46)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Prineville RHIP Target
(0.62)
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Redmond
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Redmond
0.65
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.66)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Redmond RHIP Target
(0.62)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Warm Springs
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Warm Springs
0.44
Per 1,000 people
(2018-2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(0.34)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Warm Springs RHIP Target
(0.62)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Adults with Current Asthma County: Crook
Adults with Current Asthma County: Crook
11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Crook RHIP Target
(7.4%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Current Asthma County: Deschutes
Adults with Current Asthma County: Deschutes
10.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(8.2%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Current Asthma County: Jefferson
Adults with Current Asthma County: Jefferson
11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(12.9%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: La Pine
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: La Pine
12.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(8.2%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Madras
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Madras
12.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(12.9%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Prineville
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Prineville
11.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Crook, OR County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Crook County value.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Crook RHIP Target
(7.4%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Redmond
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Redmond
11.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(10.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(8.2%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Warm Springs
15.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(11.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
US Value
(9.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(12.9%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted
Value
Compared to:
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Crook
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Crook
7.8%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(7.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(7.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
7.1%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(8.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(6.4%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
5.4%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 34 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(7.2%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(11.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(4.9%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease
Value
Compared to:
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Crook
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Crook
9.7%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(6.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(8.7%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Deschutes
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Deschutes
4.8%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(4.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(4.3%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Jefferson
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Jefferson
5.7%
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 32 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(7.1%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(5.1%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: La Pine
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: La Pine
13.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(5.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Madras
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Madras
12.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(18.3%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prineville
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prineville
11.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Crook RHIP Target
(9.5%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Redmond
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Redmond
10.4%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(5.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Warm Springs
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(12.0%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(18.3%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: La Pine
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: La Pine
29.8%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(19.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Madras
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Madras
35.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(39.2%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Prineville
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Prineville
33.1%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Crook RHIP Target
(29.3%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Redmond
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Redmond
29.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(19.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Warm Springs
41.7%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
US Value
(33.3%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(39.2%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade
Value
Compared to:
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Crook
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Crook
17.9%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Value
(22.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(28.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(38%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Deschutes
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Deschutes
15.5%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Value
(22.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(17.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(33%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Jefferson
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Jefferson
19.5%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Value
(22.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(30.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(41%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade
Value
Compared to:
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Crook
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Crook
9.0%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Value
(16.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(21.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(31.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Deschutes
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Deschutes
8.7%
Percent (%)
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Value
(16.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(11.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(26.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Jefferson
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Jefferson
14.6%
Percent (%)
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Value
(16.4% in 2019)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(14.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(25.0%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days
Value
Compared to:
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
91.6%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(88.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(37.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(47%)
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
30.5%
Percentage
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(24.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(93.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(38%)
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
86.8%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(88.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(21.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(32%)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days
Value
Compared to:
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
88.1%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(80.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(29.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(39%)
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
19.7%
Percentage
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(18.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(83.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(26%)
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
83.3%
Percentage
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(80.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(19.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(30%)
Adults who Smoke County: Crook
Adults who Smoke County: Crook
16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults who Smoke County: Deschutes
Adults who Smoke County: Deschutes
10.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults who Smoke County: Jefferson
Adults who Smoke County: Jefferson
16.3%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
U.S. Counties
The distribution is based on data from 3,133 U.S. counties and county equivalents.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults who Smoke Census Place: La Pine
Adults who Smoke Census Place: La Pine
17.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Madras
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Madras
16.6%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Prineville
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Prineville
16.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Crook, OR County Value
(16.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Crook County value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Redmond
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Redmond
15.2%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Deschutes, OR County Value
(10.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Deschutes County value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Warm Springs
29.9%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 363 locales.
U.S. Census Places
The distribution is based on data from 27,875 U.S. Census Places.
Jefferson, OR County Value
(16.3%)
The regional value is compared to the Jefferson County value.
US Value
(12.9%)
The regional value is compared to the national value.
HP 2030 Target
(6.1%)
<div>TU-02: Reduce current cigarette smoking in adults <strong>(LEADING HEALTH INDICATOR)</strong></div>
Crook RHIP Target
(24.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.1%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted
Value
Compared to:
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
216.0
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(234.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(196.0)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
183.6
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(200.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(190.0)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
286.8
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(338.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(319.0)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted
Value
Compared to:
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
95.1
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(122.6)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(86.0)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
64.7
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(80.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(59.5)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
132.5
Rate per 100,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(160.3)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(128.8)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted
Value
Compared to:
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Crook
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Crook
81.8
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OR Value
(141.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(79.5)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(52.7)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Deschutes
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Deschutes
42.2
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OR Value
(141.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(38.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(23.5)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Jefferson
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Jefferson
178.5
Per 100,000 population
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
OR Value
(141.1)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(161.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(95.8)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
5-Year Syphilis Case Count Region: Central Oregon
5-Year Syphilis Case Count Region: Central Oregon
72
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(66)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(37)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit
Value
Compared to:
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Crook
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Crook
6.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8.0)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(19.10)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2024 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Deschutes
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Deschutes
9.9
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(23.10)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2024 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Jefferson
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Jefferson
10.6
(2022)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9.7)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(21.30)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2024 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Stable Housing and Supports
Stable Housing and Supports
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households
Value
Compared to:
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households Region: Central Oregon
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households Region: Central Oregon
18.92%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11.32%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Crook
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Crook
15.36%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Central Oregon Region Value
(18.92%)
The regional value is compared to the Central Oregon Region value.
Prior Value
(10.75%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Deschutes
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Deschutes
19.92%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Central Oregon Region Value
(18.92%)
The regional value is compared to the Central Oregon Region value.
Prior Value
(13.08%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Jefferson
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Jefferson
14.47%
Percent (%)
(2016-2020)
Compared to:
Central Oregon Region Value
(18.92%)
The regional value is compared to the Central Oregon Region value.
Prior Value
(8.64%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(13%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Stable Housing and Supports
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit
Value
Compared to:
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit Region: Central Oregon
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit Region: Central Oregon
30.2%
Percent (%)
(2023)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(27.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(50%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34
Value
Compared to:
Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34 Region: Central Oregon
Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34 Region: Central Oregon
32.0%
Percent (%)
(2014-2017)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(37.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(25%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes
Value
Compared to:
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Crook
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Crook
27.9%
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(21.2%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(20.2%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Deschutes
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Deschutes
14.5%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(10.8%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(22.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(26.5%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Jefferson
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Jefferson
12.0%
(2020)
Compared to:
OR Counties
(2019)
The distribution is based on data from 28 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(11.9%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(14.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(14.9%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence
Value
Compared to:
Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence Region: Central Oregon
Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence Region: Central Oregon
15.2%
(2021)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(17.6%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(30%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates
Value
Compared to:
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: La Pine
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: La Pine
13.9
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13.9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Madras
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Madras
21.3
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(19.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Madras RHIP Target
(13.8)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Prineville
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Prineville
21.5
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(22.8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Prineville RHIP Target
(15.0)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Redmond
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Redmond
16.0
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(16.1)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Warm Springs
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Warm Springs
52.0
Per 1,000 population
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(53.4)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Warm Springs RHIP Target
(35.3)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population
Value
Compared to:
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Crook
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Crook
13
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(13)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(15.8)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a>.</p>
</div>
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Deschutes
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Deschutes
15
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(15)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(17.5)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Jefferson
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Jefferson
7
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(8)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(13.5)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged
Value
Compared to:
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
12
Scale (0-26)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(12)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(14.3)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
12
Scale (0-26)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(14.6)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
9
Scale (0-26)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.3)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races
Value
Compared to:
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Crook
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Crook
10
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(11)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(12.8)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Deschutes
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Deschutes
10
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(14)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(16.6)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Jefferson
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Jefferson
6
Scale (0-26)
(2019-2020 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(9)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(11.1)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading
Value
Compared to:
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Crook
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Crook
47.9%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(50.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Crook RHIP Target
(54.5%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Deschutes
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Deschutes
60.1%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(60.5%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(67.5%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Jefferson
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Jefferson
43.0%
(2018-2019)
Compared to:
OR Counties
The distribution is based on data from 36 Oregon counties.
OR Value
(46.5%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(39.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(47.5%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged
Value
Compared to:
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
44.1%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
OR Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(44.4%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(51.0%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
45.3%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
OR Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(46.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(52.0%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
42.8%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
OR Value
(33.6%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(40.7%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(49.5%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races
Value
Compared to:
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Crook
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Crook
28.6%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(40.9%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(33.5%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Deschutes
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Deschutes
40.6%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(39.1%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(47%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Jefferson
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Jefferson
35.4%
Percent (%)
(2018-2019 School Year)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(31.3%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(40.5%)
<div>
<p>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></p>
</div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned
Value
Compared to:
Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned Region: Central Oregon
Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned Region: Central Oregon
54.3%
Percent (%)
(2018-2020)
Compared to:
Prior Value
(56.8%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Central Oregon RHIP Target
(56%)
<div><span>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the </span><a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years
Value
Compared to:
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Crook
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Crook
70.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(65.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Crook RHIP Target
(80%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Deschutes
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Deschutes
69.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Deschutes RHIP Target
(80%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Jefferson
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Jefferson
66.0%
(2022)
Compared to:
OR Value
(69.0%)
The regional value is compared to the Oregon State value.
Prior Value
(71.0%)
Prior Value compares a measured value with the previously measured value. Confidence intervals were not taken into account in determining the direction of the comparison.
Trend
This comparison measures the indicator’s values over multiple time periods.<br>The Mann-Kendall Test for Statistical Significance is used to evaluate the trend<br>over 4 to 10 periods of measure, subject to data availability and comparability.
Jefferson RHIP Target
(80%)
<div>RHIP Targets are goals for each county or region as outlined in the <a href="http://www.centraloregonhealthdata.org/content/sites/cohc/RHA_and_RHIP/RHIP_2020_Final.pdf">2020-2023 Central Oregon Regional Health Improvement Plan</a></div>
