2020-2024 Regional Health Improvement Plan (RHIP) Measures
The following measures or indicators are tracked for the 2020-2024 Regional Health Improvement Plan (RHIP).
Indicator Gauge Icon Legend
Legend Colors
Red is bad, green is good, blue is not statistically different/neutral.
Compared to Distribution
the value is in the best half of communities.
the value is in the 2nd worst quarter of communities.
the value is in the worst quarter of communities.
Compared to Target
meets target;
does not meet target.
Compared to a Single Value
lower than the comparison value;
higher than the comparison value;
not statistically different from comparison value.
Trend
non-significant change over time;
significant change over time;
no change over time.
Compared to Prior Value
higher than the previous measurement period;
lower than the previous measurement period;
no statistically different change from previous measurement period.
Significantly better than the overall value
Significantly worse than the overall value
Significantly different than the overall value
No significant difference with the overall value
No data on significance available
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Crook
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Crook
![Compared to the OR Value (79.0%), Crook has a value of 87.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (87.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (77.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (76.6%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Deschutes
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Deschutes
![Compared to the OR Value (79.0%), Deschutes has a value of 78.3% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (78.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (81.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (77.3%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Jefferson
Graduation Rates Among Youth Experiencing Economic Disadvantage County: Jefferson
![Compared to the OR Value (79.0%), Jefferson has a value of 87.2% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (87.2%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (87.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (83.4%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Food Insecurity Rate County: Crook
Food Insecurity Rate County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Crook has a value of 10.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (10.5%), Crook has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Crook has a value of 10.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (10.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (13.0%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Food Insecurity Rate County: Deschutes
Food Insecurity Rate County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (10.5%), Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Deschutes has a value of 8.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (8.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (9.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (11.0%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Food Insecurity Rate County: Jefferson
Food Insecurity Rate County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (10.5%), Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (10.4%), Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (12.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (12.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.3%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Crook
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 45.4% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Crook has a value of 45.4% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (45.4%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (42.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (27.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Deschutes
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 25.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-90.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Deschutes has a value of 25.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (25.3%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (24.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (24.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Jefferson
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 28.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Jefferson has a value of 28.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (28.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32.0%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: La Pine
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: La Pine
![Compared to OR Counties, La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (25.3%), La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), La Pine has a value of 52.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, La Pine (52.5%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (35.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (24.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Madras
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Madras
![Compared to OR Counties, Madras has a value of 33.2% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 33.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (28.8%), Madras has a value of 33.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Madras has a value of 33.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Madras (33.2%) is less and better than the previously measured value (41.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Prineville
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Prineville
![Compared to OR Counties, Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the Crook, OR County Value (45.4%), Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Prineville has a value of 56.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Prineville (56.2%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (49.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (27.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Redmond
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Redmond
![Compared to OR Counties, Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (25.3%), Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Redmond has a value of 32.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Redmond (32.6%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (31.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (24.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Warm Springs
Households that are Asset Limited, Income Constrained, Employed (ALICE) Census Place: Warm Springs
![Compared to OR Counties, Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 31.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 35.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 33.4% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 40.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (28.8%), Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (32.0%), Warm Springs has a value of 16.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Warm Springs (16.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (33.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32.0%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Address Poverty and Enhance Self-Sufficiency
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Crook
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (67.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (65.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (64%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Deschutes
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (58.0%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (58.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (55%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Jefferson
Combined Housing and Transportation Cost As A Percent Of Income County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (58.0%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (53.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (55%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination
Behavioral Health: Increase Access and Coordination
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: La Pine
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: La Pine
![Compared to the prior value, La Pine (0.13) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.24).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the La Pine value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the La Pine RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Madras
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Madras
![Compared to the prior value, Madras (0.61) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.68).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Madras value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Madras RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Prineville
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Prineville
![Compared to the prior value, Prineville (0.46) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (0.46).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Prineville value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Prineville RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Redmond
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Redmond
![Compared to the prior value, Redmond (0.65) is less and worse than the previously measured value (0.66).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Redmond value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Redmond RHIP Target (0.62), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Warm Springs
Availability of Behavioral Health Providers in Rural Areas Census Place: Warm Springs
![Compared to the prior value, Warm Springs (0.44) is greater and better than the previously measured value (0.34).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Warm Springs value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Warm Springs RHIP Target (0.62), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Adults with Current Asthma County: Crook
Adults with Current Asthma County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 10.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Crook has a value of 10.8% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Crook has a value of 10.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (7.4%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Current Asthma County: Deschutes
Adults with Current Asthma County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 10.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Deschutes has a value of 10.5% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Deschutes has a value of 10.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Current Asthma County: Jefferson
Adults with Current Asthma County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 11.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.9% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Jefferson has a value of 11.1% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.2% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 10.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Jefferson has a value of 11.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (12.9%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: La Pine
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: La Pine
![Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (10.5%), La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), La Pine has a value of 11.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Madras
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Madras
![Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 11.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 11.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (11.1%), Madras has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Madras has a value of 11.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (12.9%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Prineville
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Prineville
![Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the Crook, OR County Value (10.8%), Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Prineville has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (7.4%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Redmond
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Redmond
![Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-40.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (10.5%), Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Redmond has a value of 11.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (8.2%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults with Current Asthma Census Place: Warm Springs
![Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.2% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 10.3% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 11.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (11.1%), Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (9.7%), Warm Springs has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (12.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Crook
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 7.8% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (7.2%), Crook has a value of 7.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (7.8%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (7.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (7.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 7.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (7.2%), Deschutes has a value of 7.1% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (7.1%) is less and better than the previously measured value (8.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (6.4%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
Adults with Cancer: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 5.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.3% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 7.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (7.2%), Jefferson has a value of 5.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (5.4%) is less and better than the previously measured value (11.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (4.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Crook
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 9.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (7.1%), Crook has a value of 9.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (9.7%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (6.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (8.7%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Deschutes
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 4.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (7.1%), Deschutes has a value of 4.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (4.8%) is less and better than the previously measured value (4.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (4.3%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Jefferson
Adults with Cardiovascular Disease County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 5.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 7.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 9.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (7.1%), Jefferson has a value of 5.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (5.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: La Pine
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: La Pine
![Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 10.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.3%), La Pine has a value of 10.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Madras
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Madras
![Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 9.9% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Madras has a value of 9.9% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (18.3%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prineville
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Prineville
![Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 10.4% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Prineville has a value of 10.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (9.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Redmond
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Redmond
![Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 8.2% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Redmond has a value of 8.2% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (5.3%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults with Diabetes Census Place: Warm Springs
![Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 12.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 14.2% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 11.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 13.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-10.png)
![Compared to the US Value (11.3%), Warm Springs has a value of 14.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (18.3%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: La Pine
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: La Pine
![Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 29.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 29.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), La Pine has a value of 29.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (19.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Madras
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Madras
![Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 35.6% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 35.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Madras has a value of 35.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (39.2%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Prineville
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Prineville
![Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 32.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Prineville has a value of 32.7% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (29.3%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Redmond
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Redmond
![Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 27.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Redmond has a value of 27.3% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (19.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults Who Are Obese Census Place: Warm Springs
![Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 43.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 34.1% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 36.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 43.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 36.6% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 39.8%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the US Value (33.0%), Warm Springs has a value of 43.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (39.2%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Crook
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Crook
![Compared to the OR Value (22.4%), Crook has a value of 17.9% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (17.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (28.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (38%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Deschutes
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Deschutes
![Compared to the OR Value (22.4%), Deschutes has a value of 15.5% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (15.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (33%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Jefferson
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 8th Grade County: Jefferson
![Compared to the OR Value (22.4%), Jefferson has a value of 19.5% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (19.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (30.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (41%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Crook
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Crook
![Compared to the OR Value (16.4%), Crook has a value of 9.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (9.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (21.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (31.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Deschutes
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Deschutes
![Compared to the OR Value (16.4%), Deschutes has a value of 8.7% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (8.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (11.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (26.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Jefferson
Students Eating 5+ Servings Per Day of Fruits and Vegetables: 11th Grade County: Jefferson
![Compared to the OR Value (16.4%), Jefferson has a value of 14.6% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (14.6%) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (14.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (25.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 91.6% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 27.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (88.3%), Crook has a value of 91.6% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (91.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (37.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (47%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 30.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 27.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (24.0%), Deschutes has a value of 30.5% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (30.5%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (93.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (38%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
8th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 86.8% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 27.6% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 25.1%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (88.3%), Jefferson has a value of 86.8% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (86.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (21.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (32%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 88.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (80.9%), Crook has a value of 88.1% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (88.1%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (29.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (39%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 19.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (18.0%), Deschutes has a value of 19.7% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (19.7%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (83.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (26%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
11th Grade Students with at least 60 minutes of Physical Activity: Past 7 Days County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 83.3% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 19.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 16.4%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (80.9%), Jefferson has a value of 83.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (83.3%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (19.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (30%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults who Smoke County: Crook
Adults who Smoke County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Crook has a value of 15.2% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Crook has a value of 15.2% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults who Smoke County: Deschutes
Adults who Smoke County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Deschutes has a value of 12.4% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Deschutes has a value of 12.4% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults who Smoke County: Jefferson
Adults who Smoke County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 16.7% which is in the worst 25% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 15.4% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 16.6%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-20.png)
![Compared to U.S. Counties, Jefferson has a value of 16.7% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.8% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.5%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Jefferson has a value of 16.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults who Smoke Census Place: La Pine
Adults who Smoke Census Place: La Pine
![Compared to OR Census Places, La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (12.4%), La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), La Pine has a value of 17.7% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Madras
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Madras
![Compared to OR Census Places, Madras has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Madras has a value of 15.8% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (16.7%), Madras has a value of 15.8% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Madras has a value of 15.8% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Prineville
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Prineville
![Compared to OR Census Places, Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to the Crook, OR County Value (15.2%), Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Prineville has a value of 16.3% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Redmond
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Redmond
![Compared to OR Census Places, Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-60.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is in the best 50% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes, OR County Value (12.4%), Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Redmond has a value of 15.6% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Warm Springs
Adults who Smoke Census Place: Warm Springs
![Compared to OR Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 16.0% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 17.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to U.S. Census Places, Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is in the worst 25% of census places. Census places in the best 50% have a value lower than 17.7% while census places in the worst 25% have a value higher than 20.9%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-0.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson, OR County Value (16.7%), Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the US Value (13.5%), Warm Springs has a value of 31.1% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the HP 2030 Target (6.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.9%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.1%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (24.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (216.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (234.1).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (196.0), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (183.6) is less and better than the previously measured value (200.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (190.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
Rate of persons hospitalized for stroke per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (286.8) is less and better than the previously measured value (338.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (319.0), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (95.1) is less and better than the previously measured value (122.6).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (86.0), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (64.7) is less and better than the previously measured value (80.9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (59.5), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
Rate of persons hospitalized for diabetes per 100,000: Age-adjusted County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (132.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (160.3).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (128.8), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Crook
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Crook
![Compared to the OR Value (141.1), Crook has a value of 81.8 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (81.8) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (79.5).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (52.7), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Deschutes
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Deschutes
![Compared to the OR Value (141.1), Deschutes has a value of 42.2 which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (42.2) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (38.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (23.5), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Jefferson
5-Year Gonorrhea Rate per 100,000: Age-Adjusted County: Jefferson
![Compared to the OR Value (141.1), Jefferson has a value of 178.5 which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (178.5) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (161.1).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (95.8), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
5-Year Syphilis Case Count Region: Central Oregon
5-Year Syphilis Case Count Region: Central Oregon
![Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (72) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (66).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Central Oregon value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (37), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Promote Enhanced Physical Health Across Communities
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Crook
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (6.6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (8.0).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (19.10), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Deschutes
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (9.9) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.8).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (23.10), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Jefferson
Individuals Receiving Both an Annual Wellness Visit and Preventative Dental Visit County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (10.6) is greater and better than the previously measured value (9.7).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (21.30), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Stable Housing and Supports
Stable Housing and Supports
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households Region: Central Oregon
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households Region: Central Oregon
![Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (18.92%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (11.32%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Central Oregon value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Crook
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Crook
![Compared to the Central Oregon Region Value (18.92%), Crook has a value of 15.36% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (15.36%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (10.75%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Deschutes
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Deschutes
![Compared to the Central Oregon Region Value (18.92%), Deschutes has a value of 19.92% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (19.92%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (13.08%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Jefferson
Combined Severely Rent and Mortgage Burdened Households County: Jefferson
![Compared to the Central Oregon Region Value (18.92%), Jefferson has a value of 14.47% which is lower and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (14.47%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (8.64%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (13%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Stable Housing and Supports
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit Region: Central Oregon
Housing Choice Voucher (HCV) Holders Able to Find and Lease a Housing Unit Region: Central Oregon
![Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (18.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (30.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Central Oregon value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (50%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34
Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34 Region: Central Oregon
Adults Who Reported Binge Drinking:18 to 34 Region: Central Oregon
![Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (32.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (37.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (25%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Crook
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 27.9% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-30.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (11.9%), Crook has a value of 27.9% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (27.9%) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (21.2%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (20.2%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Deschutes
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 14.5% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (10.8%), Deschutes has a value of 14.5% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (14.5%) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (26.5%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Jefferson
11th Grade Students Who Report Vaping or Using E-Cigarettes County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value lower than 21.1% while counties in the worst 25% have a value higher than 28.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-80.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (11.9%), Jefferson has a value of 12.0% which is higher and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (12.0%) is less and better than the previously measured value (14.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (14.9%), the target has been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-met.png)
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence
Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence Region: Central Oregon
Services for Newly Diagnosed Individuals With Alcohol or Drug Dependence Region: Central Oregon
![Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (15.2%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (17.6%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (30%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Substance and Alcohol Misuse: Prevention and Treatment
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: La Pine
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: La Pine
![Compared to the prior value, La Pine (13.9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13.9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the La Pine value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Madras
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Madras
![Compared to the prior value, Madras (21.3) is greater and worse than the previously measured value (19.8).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-bad.png)
![Over time, the Madras value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the Madras RHIP Target (13.8), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Prineville
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Prineville
![Compared to the prior value, Prineville (21.5) is less and better than the previously measured value (22.8).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Prineville value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Prineville RHIP Target (15.0), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Redmond
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Redmond
![Compared to the prior value, Redmond (16.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (16.1).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Redmond value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Warm Springs
Mental Health/Substance Abuse Emergency Department Visit Rates Census Place: Warm Springs
![Compared to the prior value, Warm Springs (52.0) is less and better than the previously measured value (53.4).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-good.png)
![Over time, the Warm Springs value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-bad.png)
![Compared to the Warm Springs RHIP Target (35.3), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Crook
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (13) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (13).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (15.8), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Deschutes
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (15) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (15).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (17.5), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Jefferson
Kindergarten Readiness: Total Population County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (7) is less and worse than the previously measured value (8).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-sig-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (13.5), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (12) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (12).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (14.3), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (12) is greater and better than the previously measured value (11).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (14.6), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
Kindergarten Readiness: Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (9) is not statistically different from the previously measured value (9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.3), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Crook
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (10) is less and worse than the previously measured value (11).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (12.8), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Deschutes
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (10) is less and worse than the previously measured value (14).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (16.6), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Jefferson
Kindergarten Readiness: Underserved Races County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (6) is less and worse than the previously measured value (9).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is decreasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (11.1), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Crook
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Crook
![Compared to OR Counties, Crook has a value of 47.9% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-70.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (46.5%), Crook has a value of 47.9% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (47.9%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (50.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (54.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Deschutes
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Deschutes
![Compared to OR Counties, Deschutes has a value of 60.1% which is in the best 50% of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-100.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (46.5%), Deschutes has a value of 60.1% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (60.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (60.5%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (67.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Jefferson
3rd Grade Students Proficient in Reading County: Jefferson
![Compared to OR Counties, Jefferson has a value of 43.0% which is in the 2nd worst quartile of counties. Counties in the best 50% have a value higher than 43.7% while counties in the worst 25% have a value lower than 38.7%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/gauge-dist-50.png)
![Compared to the OR Value (46.5%), Jefferson has a value of 43.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (43.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (47.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Crook
![Compared to the OR Value (33.6%), Crook has a value of 44.1% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (44.1%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (44.4%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (51.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Deschutes
![Compared to the OR Value (33.6%), Deschutes has a value of 45.3% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (45.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (46.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (52.0%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Economically Disadvantaged County: Jefferson
![Compared to the OR Value (33.6%), Jefferson has a value of 42.8% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (42.8%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (40.7%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (49.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Crook
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Crook
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (28.6%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (40.9%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is staying the same.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (33.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Deschutes
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Deschutes
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (40.6%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (39.1%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (47%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Jefferson
English Language Arts Proficiency: 3rd Grade, Underserved Races County: Jefferson
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (35.4%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (31.3%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-sig-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (40.5%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned
Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned Region: Central Oregon
Proportion of Pregnancies That are Planned Region: Central Oregon
![Compared to the prior value, Central Oregon (54.3%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (56.8%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Compared to the Central Oregon RHIP Target (56%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Upstream Prevention: The Promotion of Individual Well-Being
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Crook
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Crook
![Compared to the OR Value (69.0%), Crook has a value of 70.0% which is higher and better.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-higher-good.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Crook (70.0%) is greater and better than the previously measured value (65.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-up-good.png)
![Over time, the Crook value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Crook RHIP Target (80%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Deschutes
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Deschutes
![Compared to the OR Value (69.0%), Deschutes has a value of 69.0%.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-equal-neutral.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Deschutes (69.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Deschutes value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Deschutes RHIP Target (80%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Jefferson
Children Up-to-Date on Immunizations: 2 Years County: Jefferson
![Compared to the OR Value (69.0%), Jefferson has a value of 66.0% which is lower and worse.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/other-lower-bad.png)
![Compared to the prior value, Jefferson (66.0%) is less and worse than the previously measured value (71.0%).](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/priorvalue-down-bad.png)
![Over time, the Jefferson value is increasing, not significantly.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/trend-up-good.png)
![Compared to the Jefferson RHIP Target (80%), the target has not been met.](/content/global/application/indicators/gauges/target-unmet.png)